ensure your review protocol is aligned, AI-ready, and easy to evaluate.
The Protocol Text Review tool evaluates your protocol for completeness, clarity, and consistency before AI-assisted screening begins. It provides focused, actionable feedback on information that may be unclear or difficult to interpret.
Rather than rewriting the protocol, the tool highlights only the areas that may require clarification, such as undefined abbreviations, incomplete information, ambiguous wording, or conflicting criteria.
The tool reviews the criteria defined for Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, and Study Design. It can identify:
Vague or undefined terms, such as “elderly” or “high PD-L1 expression”
Abbreviations that have not been explained
Missing or incomplete PICOS information
Conflicting inclusion and exclusion criteria
Wording that may be open to multiple interpretations
Criteria that may be difficult to apply consistently
When potential confusion is detected, the tool recommends clearer wording or alternative phrasing. These suggestions help reviewers and AI-assisted screening tools interpret and apply the protocol more consistently.
Review all recommendations before updating the protocol. The suggestions are intended to support clearer and more reproducible screening decisions, but the review team remains responsible for defining and approving the final criteria.